Transcript — R391-toy-superposition
together:moonshotai/Kimi-K3 · reward 0.32 · 51 steps · 5417 s · status max_wall
Builder's note. v2 fixture; pre-fix harness: one heredoc failure (step 12), then printf - not the cause. Hit the 90-min wall at step 51 with no answer.json/summary.md; dictionaries P/Q/R/T 0.99-1.0, S 0.64; had concluded S not ready
Components: diagnosis 0.00, decision 0.00, reporting 0.10, progress 0.87
step 0 · model
step 0 · tool output (exit 0)
/task: total 11 drwxr-xr-x 1 1001 1001 0 Nov 10 07:18 . drwxr-xr-x 1 root root 4096 Nov 10 08:41 .. drwxr-xr-x 1 1001 1001 0 Nov 10 07:03 docs drwxr-xr-x …
/task: total 11 drwxr-xr-x 1 1001 1001 0 Nov 10 07:18 . drwxr-xr-x 1 root root 4096 Nov 10 08:41 .. drwxr-xr-x 1 1001 1001 0 Nov 10 07:03 docs drwxr-xr-x 1 1001 1001 0 Nov 10 07:19 featlib -rw-r--r-- 1 1001 1001 6810 Nov 10 08:29 instruction.md drwxr-xr-x 1 1001 1001 0 Nov 10 08:30 models drwxr-xr-x 1 1001 1001 0 Nov 10 07:19 tools /task/docs: total 5 drwxr-xr-x 1 1001 1001 0 Nov 10 07:03 . drwxr-xr-x 1 1001 1001 0 Nov 10 07:18 .. -rw-r--r-- 1 1001 1001 1595 Nov 10 07:03 ACTIVATIONS.md -rw-r--r-- 1 1001 1001 2424 Nov 10 08:29 METHOD.md /task/featlib: total 8 drwxr-xr-x 1 1001 1001 0 Nov 10 07:19 . drwxr-xr-x 1 1001 1001 0 Nov 10 07:18 .. -rw-r--r-- 1 1001 1001 92 Nov 10 06:57 __init__.py drwxr-xr-x 1 1001 1001 0 Nov 10 07:19 __pycache__ -rw-r--r-- 1 1001 1001 1688 Nov 10 06:57 extract.py -rw-r--r-- 1 1001 1001 3544 Nov 10 06:57 sae.py -rw-r--r-- 1 1001 1001 1657 Nov 10 07:16 validate.py /task/models: total 0 drwxr-xr-x 1 1001 1001 0 Nov 10 08:30 . drwxr-xr-x 1 1001 1001 0 Nov 10 07:18 .. drwxr-xr-x 1 1001 1001 0 Nov 10 08:38 audit drwxr-xr-x 1 1001 1001 0 Nov 10 07:18 dev /task/models/audit: total 0 drwxr-xr-x 1 1001 1001 0 Nov 10 08:38 . drwxr-xr-x 1 1001 1001 0 Nov 10 08:30 .. drwxr-xr-x 1 1001 1001 0 Nov 10 08:30 P drwxr-xr-x 1 1001 1001 0 Nov 10 08:30 Q drwxr-xr-x 1 1001 1001 0 Nov 10 08:38 R drwxr-xr-x 1 1001 1001 0 Nov 10 08:30 S drwxr-xr-x 1 1001 1001 0 Nov 10 08:30 T /task/models/dev: total 0 drwxr-xr-x 1 1001 1001 0 Nov 10 07:18 . drwxr-xr-x 1 1001 1001 0 Nov 10 08:30 .. drwxr-xr-x 1 1001 1001 0 Nov 10 07:18 A drwxr-xr-x 1 1001 1001 0 Nov 10 07:18 B drwxr-xr-x 1 1001 1001 0 Nov 10 07:18 C drwxr-xr-x 1 1001 1001 0 Nov 10 07:18 D /task/tools: total 3 drwxr-xr-x 1 1001 1001 0 Nov 10 07:19 . drwxr-xr-x 1 1001 1001 0 Nov 10 07:18 .. drwxr-xr-x 1 1001 1001 0 Nov 10 07:19 __pycache__ -rw-r--r-- 1 1001 1001 2456 Nov 10 06:57 recovery.py
step 0 · tool output (exit 0)
# featlib — feature extraction for toy-model audits (internal method note, v0.3) ## Purpose Before a toy model is cleared for use in the downstream study, an a…
# featlib — feature extraction for toy-model audits (internal method note, v0.3)
## Purpose
Before a toy model is cleared for use in the downstream study, an auditor inspects the features it represents in its
hidden layer. The inspection works on a *feature dictionary*: a set of unit directions in the hidden space, one per
feature, that an auditor can look at one at a time (project activations onto the atom, inspect the top-activating
inputs, check the atom against the list of features the study cares about). An audit is only as good as the
dictionary: if an atom is a blend of two features, or a feature has no atom, the auditor cannot see it.
## Method
`featlib.extract` fits a sparse autoencoder to the model's hidden activations (`featlib/sae.py`): a single ReLU
encoder layer, a decoder whose rows are the atoms (unit norm), loss = reconstruction MSE + `l1` * L1 of the codes,
Adam, 3000 steps of batch 512 on centred activations. Defaults: `n_atoms = 2 * hidden_dim`, `l1 = 0.03`, `seed = 0`.
## Validation protocol
`featlib.validate` reports the **dictionary score** = explained variance of the reconstruction on the activations the
dictionary was fit to, together with the mean number of active atoms per sample (`l0`) and the number of dead atoms.
A dictionary is **accepted** when `dictionary_score >= 0.95` and `l0 <= 0.75 * n_atoms` (the codes are not fully dense).
The defaults above were selected on the development models by maximising the dictionary score over a grid of
`n_atoms in {hidden_dim, 2*hidden_dim}` and `l1 in {0.1, 0.03, 0.01}`. Scores at the selected defaults:
| model | hidden_dim | n_atoms | dictionary_score | l0 | dead_atoms | accepted |
|-------|-----------:|--------:|-----------------:|---:|-----------:|----------|
| dev/A | see models/dev/A/meta.json | 2*hidden_dim | >= 0.99 | — | 0 | yes |
| dev/B | | 2*hidden_dim | >= 0.99 | — | 0 | yes |
| dev/C | | 2*hidden_dim | >= 0.99 | — | 0 | yes |
| dev/D | | 2*hidden_dim | >= 0.99 | — | 0 | yes |
(Exact numbers: run `python3 -m featlib.extract --model /task/models/dev/<id> --out <dir>` from `/task`; the
run is deterministic for a given seed and takes a few seconds per model on 2 CPU cores.)
## Proposal
Adopt `featlib.extract` with the defaults above as the standard extraction step for the audit of the five new models
in `models/audit/`, and treat a dictionary that passes `featlib.validate` as audit-ready.
# What is in a model directory
Each model is a small trained network whose hidden layer we study. We ship the hidden-layer activations, not the
network: `activations.npy` is an `n_samples x hidden_dim` float32 array, one row per input sampled from the model's
own input distribution. The networks were trained with an importance-weighted reconstruction objective on sparse
non-negative input features; the number of input features exceeds `hidden_dim`, so features share the hidden space.
Input distributions differ between models (feature frequencies, co-occurrence structure, importance weights, and in
one case measurement noise added to the recorded activations); `meta.json` does not describe them.
`meta.json`: `model_id`, `hidden_dim`, `n_samples`, `readout` (output nonlinearity of the trained network), `notes`.
Development models (`models/dev/*`) additionally ship ground truth, which audit models do not:
- `features.npy`: `n_features x hidden_dim` float32. Row i is the unit direction in hidden space along which input
feature i moves the activation (the model's representation of that feature). Only features the network actually
represents are listed.
- `meta.json` also has `n_features`, `feature_frequency` (fraction of samples in which feature i is active) and
`feature_importance` (the weight of feature i in the training objective), aligned with the rows of `features.npy`.
`tools/recovery.py` scores a dictionary against `features.npy` (see its docstring for the exact definition); it is the
definition the audit uses to decide whether a dictionary is trustworthy.
step 1 · model
step 1 · tool output (exit 0)
"""Sparse autoencoder dictionary learner. A dictionary is a set of K unit-norm atoms (rows of a K x m array) in the activation space of a model layer. The enco…
"""Sparse autoencoder dictionary learner.
A dictionary is a set of K unit-norm atoms (rows of a K x m array) in the activation space of a model layer. The
encoder is a single ReLU layer; the decoder is the dictionary itself. Training minimises
||x - mean - decode(encode(x - mean))||^2 + l1 * ||encode(x - mean)||_1
over centred activations, with decoder atoms renormalised to unit length after every step.
Defaults (DEFAULTS below) are the configuration that was signed off in docs/METHOD.md: they were chosen on the
development models by maximising the dictionary score reported by featlib.validate.
"""
import json
import numpy as np
import torch
DEFAULTS = dict(n_atoms_per_dim=2, l1=0.03, steps=3000, batch=512, lr=3e-3, seed=0)
class Dictionary:
def __init__(self, atoms, enc_w, enc_b, mean):
self.atoms = atoms # K x m, unit rows (float32 numpy)
self.enc_w = enc_w # K x m
self.enc_b = enc_b # K
self.mean = mean # m
@property
def n_atoms(self):
return self.atoms.shape[0]
def encode(self, acts):
x = np.asarray(acts, dtype=np.float32) - self.mean
return np.maximum(x @ self.enc_w.T + self.enc_b, 0.0)
def decode(self, codes):
return codes @ self.atoms + self.mean
def save(self, out_dir):
import os
os.makedirs(out_dir, exist_ok=True)
np.save(f"{out_dir}/dictionary.npy", self.atoms.astype(np.float32))
np.savez(f"{out_dir}/encoder.npz", enc_w=self.enc_w, enc_b=self.enc_b, mean=self.mean)
@classmethod
def load(cls, out_dir):
atoms = np.load(f"{out_dir}/dictionary.npy")
z = np.load(f"{out_dir}/encoder.npz")
return cls(atoms, z["enc_w"], z["enc_b"], z["mean"])
def train(acts, n_atoms=None, l1=None, steps=None, batch=None, lr=None, seed=None, verbose=False):
"""Train a dictionary on acts (N x m). Returns a Dictionary. Deterministic for a given seed and thread count."""
cfg = dict(DEFAULTS)
acts = np.asarray(acts, dtype=np.float32)
N, m = acts.shape
K = n_atoms if n_atoms is not None else cfg["n_atoms_per_dim"] * m
l1 = cfg["l1"] if l1 is None else l1
steps = cfg["steps"] if steps is None else steps
batch = cfg["batch"] if batch is None else batch
lr = cfg["lr"] if lr is None else lr
seed = cfg["seed"] if seed is None else seed
torch.manual_seed(seed)
g = torch.Generator().manual_seed(seed)
X = torch.from_numpy(acts)
mean = X.mean(0)
Xc = X - mean
dec = torch.nn.functional.normalize(torch.randn(K, m, generator=g), dim=1)
dec = torch.nn.Parameter(dec.clone())
enc_w = torch.nn.Parameter(dec.detach().clone())
enc_b = torch.nn.Parameter(torch.zeros(K))
opt = torch.optim.Adam([dec, enc_w, enc_b], lr=lr)
for t in range(steps):
idx = torch.randint(0, N, (batch,), generator=g)
x = Xc[idx]
a = torch.relu(x @ enc_w.T + enc_b)
xr = a @ dec
loss = ((xr - x) ** 2).sum(1).mean() + l1 * a.abs().sum(1).mean()
opt.zero_grad()
loss.backward()
opt.step()
with torch.no_grad():
dec.data = torch.nn.functional.normalize(dec.data, dim=1)
if verbose and (t % 500 == 0 or t == steps - 1):
print(f"step {t:5d} loss {loss.item():.4f}")
return Dictionary(dec.detach().numpy().astype(np.float32), enc_w.detach().numpy().astype(np.float32),
enc_b.detach().numpy().astype(np.float32), mean.numpy().astype(np.float32))
"""Dictionary score: how well a trained dictionary accounts for the activations it was fit to.
explained_variance = 1 - ||X - X_hat||^2 / ||X - mean||^2 (X_hat = decode(encode(X)))
l0 = mean number of active atoms per activation vector
dictionary_score = explained_variance
Acceptance rule used in docs/METHOD.md: dictionary_score >= 0.95 and l0 <= 0.75 * n_atoms (codes not fully dense).
"""
import json
import numpy as np
def score(acts, dictionary):
acts = np.asarray(acts, dtype=np.float32)
codes = dictionary.encode(acts)
rec = dictionary.decode(codes)
resid = ((rec - acts) ** 2).sum()
tot = ((acts - dictionary.mean) ** 2).sum()
ev = float(1.0 - resid / max(tot, 1e-12))
l0 = float((codes > 0).sum(1).mean())
dead = int(((codes > 0).sum(0) == 0).sum())
return {"dictionary_score": round(ev, 4), "explained_variance": round(ev, 4), "l0": round(l0, 3),
"n_atoms": int(dictionary.n_atoms), "dead_atoms": dead,
"accepted": bool(ev >= 0.95 and l0 <= 0.75 * dictionary.n_atoms)}
if __name__ == "__main__":
import argparse, sys
from pathlib import Path
sys.path.insert(0, str(Path(__file__).resolve().parents[1]))
from featlib.sae import Dictionary
p = argparse.ArgumentParser()
p.add_argument("--model", required=True, help="model dir containing activations.npy")
p.add_argument("--dictionary", required=True, help="output dir of featlib.extract (dictionary.npy + encoder.npz)")
a = p.parse_args()
acts = np.load(f"{a.model}/activations.npy")
print(json.dumps(score(acts, Dictionary.load(a.dictionary)), indent=1))
"""Extract a feature dictionary from a model's activations.
python3 -m featlib.extract --model /task/models/dev/A --out /workspace/dicts/A [--n-atoms K] [--l1 X] [--steps S] [--seed N]
Writes <out>/dictionary.npy (K x m float32, unit rows), <out>/encoder.npz and <out>/score.json (featlib.validate).
Run from a cwd that has featlib on sys.path (e.g. cd /task, or PYTHONPATH=/task).
"""
import argparse, json, sys, time
from pathlib import Path
import numpy as np
import torch
sys.path.insert(0, str(Path(__file__).resolve().parents[1]))
from featlib import sae, validate # noqa: E402
def main():
p = argparse.ArgumentParser()
p.add_argument("--model", required=True)
p.add_argument("--out", required=True)
p.add_argument("--n-atoms", type=int, default=None)
p.add_argument("--l1", type=float, default=None)
p.add_argument("--steps", type=int, default=None)
p.add_argument("--seed", type=int, default=None)
p.add_argument("--threads", type=int, default=2)
a = p.parse_args()
torch.set_num_threads(a.threads)
acts = np.load(f"{a.model}/activations.npy")
t0 = time.time()
d = sae.train(acts, n_atoms=a.n_atoms, l1=a.l1, steps=a.steps, seed=a.seed)
d.save(a.out)
s = validate.score(acts, d)
s["train_seconds"] = round(time.time() - t0, 1)
s["config"] = {"n_atoms": d.n_atoms, "l1": a.l1 if a.l1 is not None else sae.DEFAULTS["l1"],
"steps": a.steps if a.steps is not None else sae.DEFAULTS["steps"], "seed": a.seed if a.seed is not None else sae.DEFAULTS["seed"]}
Path(a.out, "score.json").write_text(json.dumps(s, indent=1))
print(json.dumps(s))
if __name__ == "__main__":
main()
"""featlib: sparse-dictionary feature extraction for toy-model activations (CPU, torch)."""
step 1 · tool output (exit 0)
"""Ground-truth feature recovery (available only for development models, which ship features.npy). recovery(features, atoms): features: F x m array of true f…
"""Ground-truth feature recovery (available only for development models, which ship features.npy).
recovery(features, atoms):
features: F x m array of true feature directions (rows; normalised here)
atoms: K x m array of dictionary atoms (rows; normalised here). If K > 4 * m only the first 4 * m rows are used.
Signed cosine similarity matrix C = features @ atoms.T. Greedy one-to-one matching: repeatedly take the largest
remaining entry, pair that feature with that atom, remove both. Unmatched features score 0.
Returns per-feature matched cosine, its mean ("recovery"), and the fraction of features with matched cosine >= 0.9.
The sign matters: feature directions are the directions along which the true feature pushes the activation; an atom
pointing the opposite way does not recover it.
python3 tools/recovery.py --model /task/models/dev/A --dictionary /workspace/dicts/A/dictionary.npy
"""
import json
import numpy as np
def _unit(a):
a = np.asarray(a, dtype=np.float64)
return a / np.maximum(np.linalg.norm(a, axis=1, keepdims=True), 1e-12)
def recovery(features, atoms, max_atoms_per_dim=4):
F = _unit(features)
A = np.asarray(atoms, dtype=np.float64)
m = F.shape[1]
if A.ndim != 2 or A.shape[1] != m:
raise ValueError(f"atoms must be K x {m}, got {A.shape}")
A = _unit(A[: max_atoms_per_dim * m])
C = F @ A.T
nF, nA = C.shape
matched = np.zeros(nF)
used_f = np.zeros(nF, bool)
used_a = np.zeros(nA, bool)
order = np.argsort(-C, axis=None)
n_pairs = 0
for flat in order:
i, j = divmod(int(flat), nA)
if used_f[i] or used_a[j]:
continue
matched[i] = C[i, j]
used_f[i] = used_a[j] = True
n_pairs += 1
if n_pairs == min(nF, nA):
break
matched = np.clip(matched, 0.0, 1.0)
return {"recovery": float(matched.mean()), "frac_recovered_0.9": float((matched >= 0.9).mean()),
"n_features": int(nF), "n_atoms_used": int(A.shape[0]), "per_feature": [round(float(v), 4) for v in matched]}
if __name__ == "__main__":
import argparse
p = argparse.ArgumentParser()
p.add_argument("--model", required=True, help="dev model dir with features.npy")
p.add_argument("--dictionary", required=True, help="K x m .npy file of atoms")
a = p.parse_args()
r = recovery(np.load(f"{a.model}/features.npy"), np.load(a.dictionary))
print(json.dumps(r, indent=1))
step 2 · model
step 2 · tool output (exit 0)
=== === cat: /meta.json: No such file or directory total 8 drwxrwsrwx 2 root 1001 4096 Nov 10 08:41 . drwxr-xr-x 1 root root 4096 Nov 10 08:41 .. === === cat…
=== === cat: /meta.json: No such file or directory total 8 drwxrwsrwx 2 root 1001 4096 Nov 10 08:41 . drwxr-xr-x 1 root root 4096 Nov 10 08:41 .. === === cat: /meta.json: No such file or directory total 8 drwxrwsrwx 2 root 1001 4096 Nov 10 08:41 . drwxr-xr-x 1 root root 4096 Nov 10 08:41 .. === === cat: /meta.json: No such file or directory total 8 drwxrwsrwx 2 root 1001 4096 Nov 10 08:41 . drwxr-xr-x 1 root root 4096 Nov 10 08:41 .. === === cat: /meta.json: No such file or directory total 8 drwxrwsrwx 2 root 1001 4096 Nov 10 08:41 . drwxr-xr-x 1 root root 4096 Nov 10 08:41 .. === === cat: /meta.json: No such file or directory total 8 drwxrwsrwx 2 root 1001 4096 Nov 10 08:41 . drwxr-xr-x 1 root root 4096 Nov 10 08:41 .. === === cat: /meta.json: No such file or directory total 8 drwxrwsrwx 2 root 1001 4096 Nov 10 08:41 . drwxr-xr-x 1 root root 4096 Nov 10 08:41 .. === === cat: /meta.json: No such file or directory total 8 drwxrwsrwx 2 root 1001 4096 Nov 10 08:41 . drwxr-xr-x 1 root root 4096 Nov 10 08:41 .. === === cat: /meta.json: No such file or directory total 8 drwxrwsrwx 2 root 1001 4096 Nov 10 08:41 . drwxr-xr-x 1 root root 4096 Nov 10 08:41 .. === === cat: /meta.json: No such file or directory total 8 drwxrwsrwx 2 root 1001 4096 Nov 10 08:41 . drwxr-xr-x 1 root root 4096 Nov 10 08:41 ..
step 3 · model
step 3 · tool output (exit 0)
/bin/bash world
/bin/bash world
step 4 · model
step 4 · tool output (exit 0)
; echo
; echo
step 5 · model
The shell strips `$` variables. I'll avoid shell variables and use explicit paths or Python.
step 5 · tool output (exit 0)
{ "model_id": "A", "hidden_dim": 12, "n_samples": 20000, "readout": "relu", "notes": "", "n_features": 24, "feature_frequency": [ 0.0413, 0.0395, 0…
{
"model_id": "A",
"hidden_dim": 12,
"n_samples": 20000,
"readout": "relu",
"notes": "",
"n_features": 24,
"feature_frequency": [
0.0413,
0.0395,
0.0397,
0.0399,
0.0413,
0.0404,
0.0422,
0.04,
0.0406,
0.0406,
0.0377,
0.0408,
0.0406,
0.0397,
0.0411,
0.0395,
0.0397,
0.0414,
0.0411,
0.0422,
0.0395,
0.0418,
0.0408,
0.0374
],
"feature_importance": [
1.0,
0.978,
0.957,
0.935,
0.913,
0.891,
0.87,
0.848,
0.826,
0.804,
0.783,
0.761,
0.739,
0.717,
0.696,
0.674,
0.652,
0.63,
0.609,
0.587,
0.565,
0.543,
0.522,
0.5
]
}
{
"model_id": "B",
"hidden_dim": 12,
"n_samples": 20000,
"readout": "relu",
"notes": "",
"n_features": 32,
"feature_frequency": [
0.0711,
0.0699,
0.0679,
0.0708,
0.0732,
0.0728,
0.0742,
0.0706,
0.0655,
0.0728,
0.0729,
0.071,
0.0676,
0.0715,
0.0689,
0.0689,
0.0712,
0.0724,
0.0679,
0.0683,
0.0702,
0.0703,
0.0669,
0.067,
0.0712,
0.0733,
0.0683,
0.073,
0.069,
0.0711,
0.0693,
0.0707
],
"feature_importance": [
1.0,
0.987,
0.974,
0.961,
0.948,
0.935,
0.923,
0.91,
0.897,
0.884,
0.871,
0.858,
0.845,
0.832,
0.819,
0.806,
0.794,
0.781,
0.768,
0.755,
0.742,
0.729,
0.716,
0.703,
0.69,
0.677,
0.665,
0.652,
0.639,
0.626,
0.613,
0.6
]
}
{
"model_id": "C",
"hidden_dim": 12,
"n_samples": 20000,
"readout": "relu",
"notes": "",
"n_features": 24,
"feature_frequency": [
0.0682,
0.0674,
0.0688,
0.0684,
0.0685,
0.0693,
0.0705,
0.0704,
0.0702,
0.0665,
0.0685,
0.0684,
0.0677,
0.0689,
0.0699,
0.068,
0.0676,
0.0707,
0.0674,
0.0658,
0.0659,
0.0698,
0.0705,
0.069
],
"feature_importance": [
0.502,
0.968,
0.775,
0.9,
0.878,
0.778,
0.792,
0.754,
0.736,
0.811,
0.97,
0.958,
0.956,
0.944,
0.608,
0.641,
0.95,
0.628,
0.614,
0.953,
0.6,
0.582,
0.877,
0.843
]
}
{
"model_id": "D",
"hidden_dim": 12,
"n_samples": 20000,
"readout": "relu",
"notes": "",
"n_features": 22,
"feature_frequency": [
0.0506,
0.0509,
0.0494,
0.0507,
0.0492,
0.0496,
0.049,
0.0481,
0.0481,
0.0489,
0.0485,
0.0499,
0.0481,
0.0529,
0.0491,
0.0494,
0.0501,
0.0494,
0.0523,
0.049,
0.0482,
0.0493
],
"feature_importance": [
1.0,
1.0,
1.0,
1.0,
1.0,
1.0,
1.0,
1.0,
1.0,
1.0,
1.0,
1.0,
1.0,
1.0,
1.0,
1.0,
1.0,
1.0,
1.0,
1.0,
1.0,
1.0
]
}step 5 · tool output (exit 0)
{ "model_id": "P", "hidden_dim": 12, "n_samples": 20000, "readout": "relu", "notes": "" } { "model_id": "Q", "hidden_dim": 20, "n_samples": 20000, "rea…
{
"model_id": "P",
"hidden_dim": 12,
"n_samples": 20000,
"readout": "relu",
"notes": ""
}
{
"model_id": "Q",
"hidden_dim": 20,
"n_samples": 20000,
"readout": "relu",
"notes": ""
}
{
"model_id": "R",
"hidden_dim": 12,
"n_samples": 20000,
"readout": "relu",
"notes": ""
}
{
"model_id": "S",
"hidden_dim": 16,
"n_samples": 20000,
"readout": "relu",
"notes": ""
}
{
"model_id": "T",
"hidden_dim": 12,
"n_samples": 20000,
"readout": "relu",
"notes": ""
}step 6 · model
step 6 · tool output (exit 0)
done
done
step 7 · model
step 7 · tool output (exit 0)
total 12 drwxr-sr-x 2 1001 1001 4096 Nov 10 08:42 . drwxrwsrwx 5 root 1001 4096 Nov 10 08:42 .. -rw-r--r-- 1 1001 1001 659 Nov 10 08:42 .log
total 12 drwxr-sr-x 2 1001 1001 4096 Nov 10 08:42 . drwxrwsrwx 5 root 1001 4096 Nov 10 08:42 .. -rw-r--r-- 1 1001 1001 659 Nov 10 08:42 .log
step 8 · model
The `$` variables are indeed stripped. I'll use explicit paths for each model.
step 8 · tool output (exit 0)
{"dictionary_score": 0.9992, "explained_variance": 0.9992, "l0": 0.933, "n_atoms": 24, "dead_atoms": 0, "accepted": true, "train_seconds": 2.6, "config": {"n_at…
{"dictionary_score": 0.9992, "explained_variance": 0.9992, "l0": 0.933, "n_atoms": 24, "dead_atoms": 0, "accepted": true, "train_seconds": 2.6, "config": {"n_atoms": 24, "l1": 0.03, "steps": 3000, "seed": 0}}
step 8 · tool output (exit 0)
{"dictionary_score": 0.9971, "explained_variance": 0.9971, "l0": 9.23, "n_atoms": 24, "dead_atoms": 0, "accepted": true, "train_seconds": 2.5, "config": {"n_ato…
{"dictionary_score": 0.9971, "explained_variance": 0.9971, "l0": 9.23, "n_atoms": 24, "dead_atoms": 0, "accepted": true, "train_seconds": 2.5, "config": {"n_atoms": 24, "l1": 0.03, "steps": 3000, "seed": 0}}
step 9 · model
step 9 · tool output (exit 0)
{"dictionary_score": 0.9978, "explained_variance": 0.9978, "l0": 2.043, "n_atoms": 24, "dead_atoms": 0, "accepted": true, "train_seconds": 2.5, "config": {"n_at…
{"dictionary_score": 0.9978, "explained_variance": 0.9978, "l0": 2.043, "n_atoms": 24, "dead_atoms": 0, "accepted": true, "train_seconds": 2.5, "config": {"n_atoms": 24, "l1": 0.03, "steps": 3000, "seed": 0}}
step 9 · tool output (exit 0)
{"dictionary_score": 0.9966, "explained_variance": 0.9966, "l0": 11.394, "n_atoms": 24, "dead_atoms": 0, "accepted": true, "train_seconds": 2.5, "config": {"n_a…
{"dictionary_score": 0.9966, "explained_variance": 0.9966, "l0": 11.394, "n_atoms": 24, "dead_atoms": 0, "accepted": true, "train_seconds": 2.5, "config": {"n_atoms": 24, "l1": 0.03, "steps": 3000, "seed": 0}}
step 10 · model
All four dev dictionaries are "accepted" by featlib.validate. Now the key question: what's their actual recovery?
step 10 · tool output (exit 0)
{ "recovery": 0.9999325264809333, "frac_recovered_0.9": 1.0, "n_features": 24, "n_atoms_used": 24, "per_feature": [ 1.0, 0.9999, 1.0, 0.9999, 0.9…
{
"recovery": 0.9999325264809333,
"frac_recovered_0.9": 1.0,
"n_features": 24,
"n_atoms_used": 24,
"per_feature": [
1.0,
0.9999,
1.0,
0.9999,
0.9999,
0.9999,
1.0,
1.0,
1.0,
0.9999,
1.0,
1.0,
0.9999,
1.0,
0.9999,
0.9999,
0.9999,
0.9999,
0.9999,
1.0,
1.0,
1.0,
0.9999,
0.9999
]
}
step 10 · tool output (exit 0)
{ "recovery": 0.5832839929028815, "frac_recovered_0.9": 0.09375, "n_features": 32, "n_atoms_used": 24, "per_feature": [ 0.892, 0.0, 0.7519, 0.8883,…
{
"recovery": 0.5832839929028815,
"frac_recovered_0.9": 0.09375,
"n_features": 32,
"n_atoms_used": 24,
"per_feature": [
0.892,
0.0,
0.7519,
0.8883,
0.6531,
0.0,
0.7988,
0.94,
0.712,
0.8571,
0.0,
0.7658,
0.0,
0.8415,
0.0,
0.0,
0.9734,
0.7308,
0.9262,
0.8578,
0.7426,
0.6555,
0.4861,
0.7255,
0.8507,
0.7261,
0.0,
0.6664,
0.0,
0.7862,
0.6649,
0.7723
]
}
step 11 · model
Model B shows the key flaw: accepted by validate but recovery only 0.58 (32 features but only 24 atoms!). Checking C and D.
step 11 · tool output (exit 0)
{ "recovery": 0.9877329931761921, "frac_recovered_0.9": 1.0, "n_features": 24, "n_atoms_used": 24, "per_feature": [ 0.9932, 0.9872, 0.9995, 0.9988,…
{
"recovery": 0.9877329931761921,
"frac_recovered_0.9": 1.0,
"n_features": 24,
"n_atoms_used": 24,
"per_feature": [
0.9932,
0.9872,
0.9995,
0.9988,
0.999,
0.9616,
0.9945,
0.9984,
0.9608,
0.9969,
0.997,
0.9949,
0.999,
0.9963,
0.9963,
0.9481,
0.969,
0.9987,
0.9949,
0.9468,
0.9836,
0.9973,
0.9947,
0.999
]
}
step 11 · tool output (exit 0)
{ "recovery": 0.7279654352899301, "frac_recovered_0.9": 0.0, "n_features": 22, "n_atoms_used": 24, "per_feature": [ 0.7895, 0.845, 0.4792, 0.61, …
{
"recovery": 0.7279654352899301,
"frac_recovered_0.9": 0.0,
"n_features": 22,
"n_atoms_used": 24,
"per_feature": [
0.7895,
0.845,
0.4792,
0.61,
0.7019,
0.6996,
0.7936,
0.8554,
0.8899,
0.6961,
0.8905,
0.4869,
0.7891,
0.6785,
0.6885,
0.6917,
0.7543,
0.8024,
0.6223,
0.6929,
0.7498,
0.8082
]
}
step 12 · model
Shipped defaults on dev: A 0.9999 ✓, B 0.583 ✗, C 0.988 ✓, D 0.728 ✗ — all "accepted" by validate. So validate does not track recovery. Let me examine the activations' structure across all 9 models.
step 12 · tool output (exit 2)
bash: line 1: warning: here-document at line 1 delimited by end-of-file (wanted `EOFnimport') bash: -c: line 1: syntax error near unexpected token `(' bash: -c:…
bash: line 1: warning: here-document at line 1 delimited by end-of-file (wanted `EOFnimport')
bash: -c: line 1: syntax error near unexpected token `('
bash: -c: line 1: `cat > /workspace/exp/stats.py <<'EOF'\nimport numpy as np, json\ntorch_ok = False\nmodels = ["dev/A","dev/B","dev/C","dev/D","audit/P","audit/Q","audit/R","audit/S","audit/T"]\nfor m in models:\n X = np.load(f"/task/models/{m}/activations.npy")\n Xc = X - X.mean(0)\n sv = np.linalg.svd(Xc, compute_uv=False)\n var = (sv**2)\n frac = var/var.sum()\n # effective rank\n er = np.exp(-(frac*np.log(frac+1e-12)).sum())\n # residual after projecting onto top dims? just report top singular values\n print(f"{m:9s} shape={X.shape} norm_mean={np.linalg.norm(X,axis=1).mean():.3f} "\n f"col_std_range=({X.std(0).min():.3f},{X.std(0).max():.3f}) "\n f"sv_top={np.round(sv[:6],1)} sv_min={sv.min():.2f} effrank={er:.2f} "\n f"top1_frac={frac[0]:.3f} neg_frac={(X<0).mean():.3f}")\nEOF\npython3 /workspace/exp/stats.py'
step 13 · model
The harness flattens newlines, breaking heredocs. Let me test printf-based file writing.
step 13 · tool output (exit 0)
3
3
step 14 · model
printf works. Writing the stats script now.
step 14 · tool output (exit 0)
dev/A shape=(20000, 12) norm=0.387 colstd=(0.159,0.162) svtop=[23.4 23.3 23. 22.9 22.8 22.8] svmin=21.980 effrank=11.99 top1=0.089 neg=0.314 dev/B shape=…
dev/A shape=(20000, 12) norm=0.387 colstd=(0.159,0.162) svtop=[23.4 23.3 23. 22.9 22.8 22.8] svmin=21.980 effrank=11.99 top1=0.089 neg=0.314 dev/B shape=(20000, 12) norm=0.791 colstd=(0.260,0.271) svtop=[39.5 38.5 38.2 37.9 37.8 37.3] svmin=35.977 effrank=11.98 top1=0.093 neg=0.456 dev/C shape=(20000, 12) norm=0.484 colstd=(0.157,0.249) svtop=[43.6 41.5 37.5 36.1 32.7 30.6] svmin=18.300 effrank=9.86 top1=0.178 neg=0.250 dev/D shape=(20000, 12) norm=0.868 colstd=(0.251,0.268) svtop=[38.5 38.4 38.2 38.1 37.9 37.8] svmin=33.277 effrank=11.95 top1=0.090 neg=0.503 audit/P shape=(20000, 12) norm=1.007 colstd=(0.304,0.315) svtop=[45.9 45.4 44.8 44.7 44.4 44.1] svmin=42.281 effrank=11.98 top1=0.091 neg=0.501 audit/Q shape=(20000, 20) norm=0.430 colstd=(0.125,0.140) svtop=[20.6 20.5 20.3 20.2 20.1 19.9] svmin=13.591 effrank=19.41 top1=0.061 neg=0.342 audit/R shape=(20000, 12) norm=0.831 colstd=(0.249,0.293) svtop=[45.5 44.1 41.2 40.4 40. 39.3] svmin=31.409 effrank=11.66 top1=0.119 neg=0.502 audit/S shape=(20000, 16) norm=1.517 colstd=(0.382,0.391) svtop=[56.8 56.6 56.4 56.1 56. 55.9] svmin=51.886 effrank=15.97 top1=0.067 neg=0.503 audit/T shape=(20000, 12) norm=1.100 colstd=(0.338,0.349) svtop=[51.6 50.1 49.6 48.7 48.5 48.1] svmin=46.740 effrank=11.98 top1=0.095 neg=0.495
step 15 · model
Now let me sweep featlib hyperparameters on the failing dev models (B, D) to see what drives recovery.
step 15 · tool output (exit 0)
ok
ok
step 16 · model
step 16 · tool output (exit 0)
dev/D K=48 l1=0.01 steps=3000 seed=0 | score=0.9994 l0=21.13 dead=0 acc=True | rec=0.6485 frac9=0.000 | 2.8s dev/D K=48 l1=0.03 steps=3000 seed=0 | score=0.9957…
dev/D K=48 l1=0.01 steps=3000 seed=0 | score=0.9994 l0=21.13 dead=0 acc=True | rec=0.6485 frac9=0.000 | 2.8s dev/D K=48 l1=0.03 steps=3000 seed=0 | score=0.9957 l0=19.72 dead=0 acc=True | rec=0.7563 frac9=0.000 | 1.8s dev/D K=48 l1=0.1 steps=3000 seed=0 | score=0.9608 l0=16.79 dead=0 acc=True | rec=0.8708 frac9=0.409 | 1.9s dev/D K=24 l1=0.1 steps=3000 seed=0 | score=0.9668 l0=10.02 dead=0 acc=True | rec=0.6154 frac9=0.000 | 1.8s dev/D K=48 l1=0.3 steps=3000 seed=0 | score=0.7809 l0=9.32 dead=0 acc=False | rec=0.8512 frac9=0.182 | 1.9s
step 16 · tool output (exit 0)
dev/B K=48 l1=0.01 steps=3000 seed=0 | score=0.9994 l0=18.85 dead=0 acc=True | rec=0.7143 frac9=0.031 | 2.7s dev/B K=48 l1=0.03 steps=3000 seed=0 | score=0.9958…
dev/B K=48 l1=0.01 steps=3000 seed=0 | score=0.9994 l0=18.85 dead=0 acc=True | rec=0.7143 frac9=0.031 | 2.7s dev/B K=48 l1=0.03 steps=3000 seed=0 | score=0.9958 l0=15.38 dead=0 acc=True | rec=0.8001 frac9=0.250 | 1.9s dev/B K=48 l1=0.1 steps=3000 seed=0 | score=0.9499 l0=8.01 dead=0 acc=False | rec=0.9814 frac9=0.969 | 1.8s dev/B K=48 l1=0.3 steps=3000 seed=0 | score=0.8815 l0=2.89 dead=0 acc=False | rec=0.9899 frac9=1.000 | 2.0s
step 17 · model
B is fixed by K=4m + higher l1 (recovery 0.99 at l1=0.3, though validate score drops to 0.88!). D is harder. Let me push D with longer training and more l1 values.
step 17 · tool output (exit 0)
dev/D K=48 l1=0.1 steps=12000 seed=0 | score=0.9641 l0=17.41 dead=0 acc=True | rec=0.8634 frac9=0.318 | 8.3s dev/D K=48 l1=0.15 steps=12000 seed=0 | score=0.925…
dev/D K=48 l1=0.1 steps=12000 seed=0 | score=0.9641 l0=17.41 dead=0 acc=True | rec=0.8634 frac9=0.318 | 8.3s dev/D K=48 l1=0.15 steps=12000 seed=0 | score=0.9252 l0=14.98 dead=0 acc=False | rec=0.8129 frac9=0.136 | 7.2s dev/D K=48 l1=0.2 steps=12000 seed=0 | score=0.8798 l0=12.63 dead=0 acc=False | rec=0.8238 frac9=0.227 | 7.0s dev/D K=48 l1=0.3 steps=12000 seed=0 | score=0.7863 l0=9.35 dead=0 acc=False | rec=0.8761 frac9=0.455 | 7.0s dev/D K=48 l1=0.15 steps=12000 seed=1 | score=0.9215 l0=14.57 dead=0 acc=False | rec=0.8265 frac9=0.136 | 7.4s dev/D K=48 l1=0.2 steps=12000 seed=1 | score=0.8780 l0=12.58 dead=0 acc=False | rec=0.8140 frac9=0.182 | 7.4s
step 18 · model
D resists the plain SAE. Let me diagnose what's structurally different about D using its ground-truth features.
step 18 · tool output (exit 0)
A F=24 maxoff=1.000 mean|off|=0.042 pairs>0.5=12 maxpos=0.000 mincos=-1.000 B F=32 maxoff=0.703 mean|off|=0.157 pairs>0.5=48 maxpos=0.231 mincos=-0.703 C …
A F=24 maxoff=1.000 mean|off|=0.042 pairs>0.5=12 maxpos=0.000 mincos=-1.000 B F=32 maxoff=0.703 mean|off|=0.157 pairs>0.5=48 maxpos=0.231 mincos=-0.703 C F=24 maxoff=0.999 mean|off|=0.055 pairs>0.5=12 maxpos=0.035 mincos=-0.999 D F=22 maxoff=1.000 mean|off|=0.041 pairs>0.5=10 maxpos=0.001 mincos=-1.000
step 19 · model
step 19 · tool output (exit 0)
A resid_norm mean=0.0000 median=0.0000 | act_norm mean=0.3835 | ratio=0.0000 B resid_norm mean=0.0000 median=0.0000 | act_norm mean=0.7891 | ratio=0.0000 C resi…
A resid_norm mean=0.0000 median=0.0000 | act_norm mean=0.3835 | ratio=0.0000 B resid_norm mean=0.0000 median=0.0000 | act_norm mean=0.7891 | ratio=0.0000 C resid_norm mean=0.0000 median=0.0000 | act_norm mean=0.4782 | ratio=0.0000 D resid_norm mean=0.1401 median=0.1071 | act_norm mean=0.8731 | ratio=0.1604
step 20 · model
step 20 · tool output (exit 0)
dev/D K=48 l1=0.1 iters=1 | rec0=0.8708 -> rec_sharp=0.8794 frac9=0.455 dev/D K=48 l1=0.1 iters=5 | rec0=0.8708 -> rec_sharp=0.8804 frac9=0.409 dev/D K=48 l1=0.…
dev/D K=48 l1=0.1 iters=1 | rec0=0.8708 -> rec_sharp=0.8794 frac9=0.455 dev/D K=48 l1=0.1 iters=5 | rec0=0.8708 -> rec_sharp=0.8804 frac9=0.409 dev/D K=48 l1=0.3 iters=5 | rec0=0.8512 -> rec_sharp=0.8574 frac9=0.318 dev/B K=48 l1=0.1 iters=5 | rec0=0.9814 -> rec_sharp=0.8732 frac9=0.406 dev/A K=48 l1=0.03 iters=5 | rec0=0.9901 -> rec_sharp=0.9706 frac9=1.000 dev/C K=48 l1=0.03 iters=5 | rec0=0.9650 -> rec_sharp=0.5824 frac9=0.000
step 21 · model
step 21 · tool output (exit 0)
dev/D K=48 l1=0.1 p=1.0 | rec0=0.8708 -> 0.9070 frac9=0.727 dev/B K=48 l1=0.1 p=1.0 | rec0=0.9814 -> 0.9976 frac9=1.000 dev/C K=48 l1=0.03 p=1.0 | rec0=0.9650 -…
dev/D K=48 l1=0.1 p=1.0 | rec0=0.8708 -> 0.9070 frac9=0.727 dev/B K=48 l1=0.1 p=1.0 | rec0=0.9814 -> 0.9976 frac9=1.000 dev/C K=48 l1=0.03 p=1.0 | rec0=0.9650 -> 0.8200 frac9=0.083 dev/A K=48 l1=0.03 p=1.0 | rec0=0.9901 -> 0.9994 frac9=1.000 dev/D K=48 l1=0.1 p=2.0 | rec0=0.8708 -> 0.9428 frac9=0.864 dev/B K=48 l1=0.1 p=2.0 | rec0=0.9814 -> 0.9988 frac9=1.000 dev/C K=48 l1=0.03 p=2.0 | rec0=0.9650 -> 0.8470 frac9=0.167 dev/A K=48 l1=0.03 p=2.0 | rec0=0.9901 -> 0.9993 frac9=1.000
step 22 · model
step 22 · tool output (exit 1)
Traceback (most recent call last): File "/workspace/exp/em.py", line 74, in <module> run("dev/D", 48, 0.02, 30, 0, sae_init=0.1) File "/workspace/exp/em…
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/workspace/exp/em.py", line 74, in <module>
run("dev/D", 48, 0.02, 30, 0, sae_init=0.1)
File "/workspace/exp/em.py", line 67, in run
W, b, Z = em_fit(X, K, lam, T=T, seed=seed, init=init)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
File "/workspace/exp/em.py", line 46, in em_fit
Wn = torch.linalg.solve(ZtZ, (Z.T @ (X - b)).T.contiguous()).T # wait dims
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
RuntimeError: linalg.solve: Incompatible shapes of A and B for the equation AX = B (48x48 and 12x48)
step 23 · model
step 23 · tool output (exit 0)
dev/D K=48 lam=0.02 T=30 init=0.1 | rec=0.8647 frac9=0.409 live=48 | 12.5s dev/D K=48 lam=0.05 T=30 init=0.1 | rec=0.8596 frac9=0.409 live=48 | 12.3s dev/D K=48…
dev/D K=48 lam=0.02 T=30 init=0.1 | rec=0.8647 frac9=0.409 live=48 | 12.5s dev/D K=48 lam=0.05 T=30 init=0.1 | rec=0.8596 frac9=0.409 live=48 | 12.3s dev/D K=48 lam=0.1 T=30 init=0.1 | rec=0.8777 frac9=0.545 live=48 | 12.4s
step 24 · model
EM plateaus like the SAE on D. Let me diagnose the failure pattern: are antipodal pairs being merged into single atoms?
step 24 · tool output (exit 0)
rec=0.8777 pair ( 0,12) cos=-1.000 matched: 0.911 / 0.949 pair ( 1, 7) cos=-1.000 matched: 0.898 / 0.935 pair ( 2,11) cos=-1.000 matched: 0.876 / 0.907 pair …
rec=0.8777 pair ( 0,12) cos=-1.000 matched: 0.911 / 0.949 pair ( 1, 7) cos=-1.000 matched: 0.898 / 0.935 pair ( 2,11) cos=-1.000 matched: 0.876 / 0.907 pair ( 3,18) cos=-1.000 matched: 0.735 / 0.646 pair ( 4, 5) cos=-1.000 matched: 0.826 / 0.966 pair ( 6, 3) cos=-0.001 matched: 0.852 / 0.735 pair ( 8,10) cos=-1.000 matched: 0.737 / 0.971 pair ( 9,15) cos=-1.000 matched: 0.933 / 0.920 pair (13, 1) cos=-0.001 matched: 0.810 / 0.898 pair (14,19) cos=-1.000 matched: 0.991 / 0.963 pair (16,20) cos=-1.000 matched: 0.977 / 0.943 pair (17,21) cos=-1.000 matched: 0.830 / 0.732
step 25 · model
No merging — atoms are all approximately right but noise-jittered (0.65–0.97). The fix is averaging with good codes. Let me combine EM inference (FISTA codes) with iterative weighted-average sharpening.
step 25 · tool output (exit 0)
dev/D lamEM=0.1 lamR=0.1 p=2 rounds=6 | em=0.8781 -> refined=0.9743 frac9=1.000 dev/D lamEM=0.1 lamR=0.05 p=2 rounds=6 | em=0.8781 -> refined=0.9693 frac9=0.909…
dev/D lamEM=0.1 lamR=0.1 p=2 rounds=6 | em=0.8781 -> refined=0.9743 frac9=1.000 dev/D lamEM=0.1 lamR=0.05 p=2 rounds=6 | em=0.8781 -> refined=0.9693 frac9=0.909 dev/D lamEM=0.1 lamR=0.1 p=3 rounds=6 | em=0.8781 -> refined=0.9778 frac9=1.000 dev/D lamEM=0.05 lamR=0.05 p=2 rounds=10 | em=0.8628 -> refined=0.9696 frac9=0.955
step 26 · model
Refinement lifts D to 0.978. Now let me verify the full pipeline (SAE init → EM → refine) on A, B, C.
step 26 · tool output (exit 0)
dev/A lamEM=0.1 lamR=0.1 p=2 rounds=6 | em=0.9992 -> refined=0.9987 frac9=1.000 dev/B lamEM=0.1 lamR=0.1 p=2 rounds=6 | em=0.9999 -> refined=0.9990 frac9=1.000 …
dev/A lamEM=0.1 lamR=0.1 p=2 rounds=6 | em=0.9992 -> refined=0.9987 frac9=1.000 dev/B lamEM=0.1 lamR=0.1 p=2 rounds=6 | em=0.9999 -> refined=0.9990 frac9=1.000 dev/C lamEM=0.1 lamR=0.1 p=2 rounds=6 | em=0.9877 -> refined=0.9155 frac9=0.625 dev/A lamEM=0.1 lamR=0.1 p=3 rounds=6 | em=0.9992 -> refined=0.9988 frac9=1.000 dev/B lamEM=0.1 lamR=0.1 p=3 rounds=6 | em=0.9999 -> refined=0.9989 frac9=1.000 dev/C lamEM=0.1 lamR=0.1 p=3 rounds=6 | em=0.9877 -> refined=0.9338 frac9=0.708
step 27 · model
Refinement hurts C — I suspect C has co-occurring (correlated) features, which biases the weighted average. Let me check true-code co-occurrence for each dev model.
step 27 · tool output (exit 0)
A mean_active=0.94 lift max=29.30 min=0.00 frac_pairs_lift>1.5=0.028 B mean_active=20.30 lift max=1.30 min=0.50 frac_pairs_lift>1.5=0.000 C mean_active=5.35 lif…
A mean_active=0.94 lift max=29.30 min=0.00 frac_pairs_lift>1.5=0.028 B mean_active=20.30 lift max=1.30 min=0.50 frac_pairs_lift>1.5=0.000 C mean_active=5.35 lift max=4.28 min=0.99 frac_pairs_lift>1.5=0.903 D mean_active=16.47 lift max=1.11 min=0.17 frac_pairs_lift>1.5=0.000
step 28 · model
The NNLS codes are too dense to read co-occurrence. Let me run a decisive experiment instead: initialize EM at the *true* features for D and see whether EM stays (~1.0 ⇒ local-optima problem) or degrades (⇒ objective misspecified).
step 28 · tool output (exit 0)
EM from truth: rec=0.9368 frac9=0.818 refine from truth: rec=0.9988 frac9=1.000 refine p=3 from truth: rec=0.9982 frac9=1.000
EM from truth: rec=0.9368 frac9=0.818 refine from truth: rec=0.9988 frac9=1.000 refine p=3 from truth: rec=0.9982 frac9=1.000
step 29 · model
EM degrades even from the truth on D (misspecified objective), while refinement's fixed point is essentially the truth there. Let me check refinement-from-truth on A/B/C to see if it's biased for C specifically.
step 29 · tool output (exit 0)
A refine-from-truth=0.9993 (frac9 1.000) | EM-from-truth=1.0000 B refine-from-truth=0.9993 (frac9 1.000) | EM-from-truth=0.9999 C refine-from-truth=0.8666 (frac…
A refine-from-truth=0.9993 (frac9 1.000) | EM-from-truth=1.0000 B refine-from-truth=0.9993 (frac9 1.000) | EM-from-truth=0.9999 C refine-from-truth=0.8666 (frac9 0.000) | EM-from-truth=0.9958
step 30 · model
step 30 · tool output (exit 1)
Traceback (most recent call last): File "/workspace/exp/refine2.py", line 48, in <module> run("dev/C", 48, 0.1, 0.1, 1.0, 10, from_truth=True) File "/wo…
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/workspace/exp/refine2.py", line 48, in <module>
run("dev/C", 48, 0.1, 0.1, 1.0, 10, from_truth=True)
File "/workspace/exp/refine2.py", line 43, in run
W2 = refine2(X, W0, b, lamR, rounds=rounds, p=p)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
File "/workspace/exp/refine2.py", line 23, in refine2
T = R + Z @ W - (Z @ W - Z * 0) # placeholder
~~~~~~^~~~~~~
RuntimeError: The size of tensor a (12) must match the size of tensor b (24) at non-singleton dimension 1
step 31 · model
step 31 · tool output (exit 0)
dev/C truth=True lamR=0.1 p=1 rounds=10 | base=1.0000 -> refine2=0.9627 frac9=1.000 dev/C truth=False lamR=0.1 p=1 rounds=10 | base=0.9877 -> refine2=0.9800 fra…
dev/C truth=True lamR=0.1 p=1 rounds=10 | base=1.0000 -> refine2=0.9627 frac9=1.000 dev/C truth=False lamR=0.1 p=1 rounds=10 | base=0.9877 -> refine2=0.9800 frac9=1.000 dev/D truth=False lamR=0.1 p=1 rounds=10 | base=0.8781 -> refine2=0.9218 frac9=0.727 dev/D truth=False lamR=0.1 p=2 rounds=10 | base=0.8781 -> refine2=0.9502 frac9=0.864 dev/A truth=False lamR=0.1 p=1 rounds=10 | base=0.9992 -> refine2=0.9998 frac9=1.000 dev/B truth=False lamR=0.1 p=1 rounds=10 | base=0.9999 -> refine2=0.9999 frac9=1.000
step 32 · model
step 32 · tool output (exit 0)
A EM resid_frac=0.0278 (EV=0.9722) B EM resid_frac=0.0270 (EV=0.9730) C EM resid_frac=0.0188 (EV=0.9812) D EM resid_frac=0.0760 (EV=0.9240)
A EM resid_frac=0.0278 (EV=0.9722) B EM resid_frac=0.0270 (EV=0.9730) C EM resid_frac=0.0188 (EV=0.9812) D EM resid_frac=0.0760 (EV=0.9240)
step 33 · model
step 33 · tool output (exit 0)
dev/C mode=em seeds=[0, 1, 2] -> clusters=75 rec=0.9888 frac9=1.000 dev/C mode=em seeds=[0] -> clusters=48 rec=0.9877 frac9=1.000 dev/D mode=refine seeds=[0, 1,…
dev/C mode=em seeds=[0, 1, 2] -> clusters=75 rec=0.9888 frac9=1.000 dev/C mode=em seeds=[0] -> clusters=48 rec=0.9877 frac9=1.000 dev/D mode=refine seeds=[0, 1, 2] -> clusters=91 rec=0.9895 frac9=1.000 dev/D mode=refine seeds=[0] -> clusters=48 rec=0.9778 frac9=1.000 dev/A mode=refine seeds=[0, 1, 2] -> clusters=89 rec=0.9993 frac9=1.000 dev/B mode=refine seeds=[0, 1, 2] -> clusters=70 rec=0.9989 frac9=1.000
step 34 · model
Multi-seed averaging: D → 0.9895, C → 0.9888. Now the critical piece: held-out EV model selection. Let me verify it picks the right mode per dev model.
step 34 · tool output (exit 0)
dev/C mode=em seeds=[0, 1, 2] -> clusters=75 rec=0.9888 frac9=1.000 dev/C mode=em seeds=[0] -> clusters=48 rec=0.9877 frac9=1.000 dev/D mode=refine seeds=[0, 1,…
dev/C mode=em seeds=[0, 1, 2] -> clusters=75 rec=0.9888 frac9=1.000 dev/C mode=em seeds=[0] -> clusters=48 rec=0.9877 frac9=1.000 dev/D mode=refine seeds=[0, 1, 2] -> clusters=91 rec=0.9895 frac9=1.000 dev/D mode=refine seeds=[0] -> clusters=48 rec=0.9778 frac9=1.000 dev/A mode=refine seeds=[0, 1, 2] -> clusters=89 rec=0.9993 frac9=1.000 dev/B mode=refine seeds=[0, 1, 2] -> clusters=70 rec=0.9989 frac9=1.000 dev/A half-fit | EM: ev=0.97270 rec=0.9998 | R2: ev=0.97310 rec=1.0000 | RF: ev=0.97001 rec=0.9987 | sel=1 dev/B half-fit | EM: ev=0.97306 rec=0.9999 | R2: ev=0.97317 rec=0.9999 | RF: ev=0.96984 rec=0.9981 | sel=1 dev/C half-fit | EM: ev=0.98094 rec=0.9869 | R2: ev=0.98038 rec=0.9680 | RF: ev=0.96723 rec=0.9191 | sel=0 dev/D half-fit | EM: ev=0.94081 rec=0.8753 | R2: ev=0.93995 rec=0.9135 | RF: ev=0.92463 rec=0.9829 | sel=0
step 35 · model
step 35 · tool output (exit 0)
dev/C tau=0.05 p=3 rounds=8 | em=0.9877 -> refine3=0.9841 frac9=1.000 dev/C tau=0.10 p=3 rounds=8 | em=0.9877 -> refine3=0.9832 frac9=1.000 dev/C tau=0.20 p=3 r…
dev/C tau=0.05 p=3 rounds=8 | em=0.9877 -> refine3=0.9841 frac9=1.000 dev/C tau=0.10 p=3 rounds=8 | em=0.9877 -> refine3=0.9832 frac9=1.000 dev/C tau=0.20 p=3 rounds=8 | em=0.9877 -> refine3=0.9790 frac9=1.000 dev/D tau=0.05 p=3 rounds=8 | em=0.8781 -> refine3=0.9711 frac9=0.955 dev/D tau=0.10 p=3 rounds=8 | em=0.8781 -> refine3=0.9754 frac9=1.000 dev/D tau=0.20 p=3 rounds=8 | em=0.8781 -> refine3=0.9835 frac9=1.000
step 36 · model
refine3 works for both C (0.983) and D (0.975–0.984) — no per-model selection needed. Let me verify A/B and pick τ with multi-seed averaging.
step 36 · tool output (exit 0)
dev/C mode=em seeds=[0, 1, 2] -> clusters=75 rec=0.9888 frac9=1.000 dev/C mode=em seeds=[0] -> clusters=48 rec=0.9877 frac9=1.000 dev/D mode=refine seeds=[0, 1,…
dev/C mode=em seeds=[0, 1, 2] -> clusters=75 rec=0.9888 frac9=1.000 dev/C mode=em seeds=[0] -> clusters=48 rec=0.9877 frac9=1.000 dev/D mode=refine seeds=[0, 1, 2] -> clusters=91 rec=0.9895 frac9=1.000 dev/D mode=refine seeds=[0] -> clusters=48 rec=0.9778 frac9=1.000 dev/A mode=refine seeds=[0, 1, 2] -> clusters=89 rec=0.9993 frac9=1.000 dev/B mode=refine seeds=[0, 1, 2] -> clusters=70 rec=0.9989 frac9=1.000 dev/A tau=0.15 p=3 seeds=[0, 1, 2] -> K=91 rec=0.9999 frac9=1.000 dev/B tau=0.15 p=3 seeds=[0, 1, 2] -> K=65 rec=0.9997 frac9=1.000 dev/C tau=0.10 p=3 seeds=[0, 1, 2] -> K=74 rec=0.9733 frac9=1.000 dev/C tau=0.15 p=3 seeds=[0, 1, 2] -> K=75 rec=0.9715 frac9=0.958 dev/D tau=0.15 p=3 seeds=[0, 1, 2] -> K=101 rec=0.9920 frac9=1.000 dev/D tau=0.20 p=3 seeds=[0, 1, 2] -> K=98 rec=0.9924 frac9=1.000
step 37 · model
step 37 · tool output (exit 0)
A | EM rec=1.0000 kurt=16.7 resid=0.0012 || R3 rec=0.9999 kurt=15.9 resid=0.0013 B | EM rec=1.0000 kurt=4.0 resid=0.0013 || R3 rec=0.9997 kurt=4.0 resid=0.0015 …
A | EM rec=1.0000 kurt=16.7 resid=0.0012 || R3 rec=0.9999 kurt=15.9 resid=0.0013 B | EM rec=1.0000 kurt=4.0 resid=0.0013 || R3 rec=0.9997 kurt=4.0 resid=0.0015 C | EM rec=0.9888 kurt=9.7 resid=0.0010 || R3 rec=0.9715 kurt=9.0 resid=0.0016 D | EM rec=0.8810 kurt=1.8 resid=0.0104 || R3 rec=0.9920 kurt=2.0 resid=0.0099
step 38 · model
step 38 · tool output (exit 0)
ok
ok
step 39 · model
Now the simulation-based recovery estimator.
step 39 · tool output (exit 0)
written
written
step 40 · model
step 40 · tool output (exit 0)
sim: n_eff=30 sig_frac=0.0012 sim_rec=0.9620 frac9=0.900 A noisy=False | true_rec=1.0000 | sim_rec=0.9620 n_eff=30 resid=0.0012 | 64s sim: n_eff=48 sig_frac…
sim: n_eff=30 sig_frac=0.0012 sim_rec=0.9620 frac9=0.900 A noisy=False | true_rec=1.0000 | sim_rec=0.9620 n_eff=30 resid=0.0012 | 64s sim: n_eff=48 sig_frac=0.0013 sim_rec=0.9065 frac9=0.854 B noisy=False | true_rec=1.0000 | sim_rec=0.9065 n_eff=48 resid=0.0013 | 72s sim: n_eff=47 sig_frac=0.0010 sim_rec=0.8195 frac9=0.723 C noisy=False | true_rec=0.9888 | sim_rec=0.8195 n_eff=47 resid=0.0010 | 68s sim: n_eff=48 sig_frac=0.0099 sim_rec=0.8841 frac9=0.812 D noisy=True | true_rec=0.9920 | sim_rec=0.8841 n_eff=48 resid=0.0099 | 128s
step 40 · tool output (exit 0)
{"dictionary_score": 0.9975, "explained_variance": 0.9975, "l0": 11.407, "n_atoms": 24, "dead_atoms": 0, "accepted": true, "train_seconds": 2.6, "config": {"n_a…
{"dictionary_score": 0.9975, "explained_variance": 0.9975, "l0": 11.407, "n_atoms": 24, "dead_atoms": 0, "accepted": true, "train_seconds": 2.6, "config": {"n_atoms": 24, "l1": 0.03, "steps": 3000, "seed": 0}}
{"dictionary_score": 0.9978, "explained_variance": 0.9978, "l0": 1.212, "n_atoms": 40, "dead_atoms": 0, "accepted": true, "train_seconds": 2.7, "config": {"n_atoms": 40, "l1": 0.03, "steps": 3000, "seed": 0}}
{"dictionary_score": 0.9968, "explained_variance": 0.9968, "l0": 11.018, "n_atoms": 24, "dead_atoms": 0, "accepted": true, "train_seconds": 2.6, "config": {"n_atoms": 24, "l1": 0.03, "steps": 3000, "seed": 0}}
{"dictionary_score": 0.9984, "explained_variance": 0.9984, "l0": 15.491, "n_atoms": 32, "dead_atoms": 0, "accepted": true, "train_seconds": 2.6, "config": {"n_atoms": 32, "l1": 0.03, "steps": 3000, "seed": 0}}
{"dictionary_score": 0.998, "explained_variance": 0.998, "l0": 10.887, "n_atoms": 24, "dead_atoms": 0, "accepted": true, "train_seconds": 2.6, "config": {"n_atoms": 24, "l1": 0.03, "steps": 3000, "seed": 0}}
step 41 · model
step 41 · tool output (exit 0)
== A (true F=24, atoms=48, matched=24) == 0 mass= 330.5 kurt= 43.71 hit=1 | 2 mass= 320.0 kurt= 46.20 hit=1 | 7 mass= 317.1 kurt= 46.73 hit=1 | 8 …
== A (true F=24, atoms=48, matched=24) == 0 mass= 330.5 kurt= 43.71 hit=1 | 2 mass= 320.0 kurt= 46.20 hit=1 | 7 mass= 317.1 kurt= 46.73 hit=1 | 8 mass= 315.9 kurt= 45.91 hit=1 | 4 mass= 314.5 kurt= 47.10 hit=1 | 1 mass= 312.2 kurt= 47.38 hit=1 | 3 mass= 306.0 kurt= 48.13 hit=1 | 5 mass= 299.2 kurt= 49.59 hit=1 | 11 mass= 298.2 kurt= 49.22 hit=1 | 20 mass= 295.4 kurt= 50.03 hit=1 | 9 mass= 295.2 kurt= 50.10 hit=1 | 13 mass= 293.3 kurt= 50.50 hit=1 | 17 mass= 292.3 kurt= 50.00 hit=1 | 14 mass= 291.8 kurt= 50.05 hit=1 | 12 mass= 289.8 kurt= 51.45 hit=1 | 16 mass= 288.5 kurt= 51.53 hit=1 mass hit-median=292.8 miss-median=14.9 ; kurt hit-med=50.08 miss-med=1341.27 == B (true F=32, atoms=48, matched=32) == 1 mass= 605.1 kurt= 25.17 hit=1 | 0 mass= 603.2 kurt= 25.27 hit=1 | 7 mass= 596.4 kurt= 25.07 hit=1 | 10 mass= 596.1 kurt= 25.32 hit=1 | 5 mass= 590.6 kurt= 26.08 hit=1 | 2 mass= 586.0 kurt= 26.35 hit=1 | 4 mass= 584.5 kurt= 25.43 hit=1 | 12 mass= 583.6 kurt= 26.25 hit=1 | 3 mass= 580.7 kurt= 26.10 hit=1 | 16 mass= 571.0 kurt= 26.35 hit=1 | 8 mass= 570.9 kurt= 26.24 hit=1 | 14 mass= 569.9 kurt= 26.13 hit=1 | 11 mass= 567.2 kurt= 26.85 hit=1 | 21 mass= 564.4 kurt= 26.75 hit=1 | 20 mass= 562.0 kurt= 27.77 hit=1 | 23 mass= 558.7 kurt= 27.09 hit=1 mass hit-median=557.5 miss-median=52.9 ; kurt hit-med=27.32 miss-med=322.09 == C (true F=24, atoms=48, matched=30) == 0 mass= 492.0 kurt= 28.36 hit=1 | 2 mass= 450.7 kurt= 32.06 hit=1 | 4 mass= 421.3 kurt= 31.42 hit=1 | 1 mass= 418.5 kurt= 41.71 hit=0 | 7 mass= 405.3 kurt= 33.38 hit=1 | 21 mass= 387.3 kurt= 50.42 hit=0 | 29 mass= 385.9 kurt= 57.64 hit=0 | 10 mass= 367.0 kurt= 36.31 hit=1 | 6 mass= 356.1 kurt= 42.70 hit=1 | 31 mass= 342.4 kurt= 55.94 hit=0 | 3 mass= 337.6 kurt= 48.29 hit=1 | 12 mass= 337.3 kurt= 44.01 hit=1 | 25 mass= 335.4 kurt= 55.92 hit=0 | 22 mass= 327.8 kurt= 43.88 hit=1 | 24 mass= 295.6 kurt= 63.03 hit=0 | 28 mass= 293.1 kurt= 64.64 hit=0 mass hit-median=182.7 miss-median=266.8 ; kurt hit-med=73.13 miss-med=69.20 == D (true F=22, atoms=48, matched=24) == 13 mass= 1102.8 kurt= 18.49 hit=1 | 0 mass= 1062.4 kurt= 20.72 hit=1 | 6 mass= 1027.6 kurt= 21.12 hit=1 | 8 mass= 1010.8 kurt= 21.57 hit=1 | 2 mass= 978.0 kurt= 22.53 hit=1 | 4 mass= 913.3 kurt= 23.03 hit=1 | 7 mass= 857.0 kurt= 22.83 hit=1 | 17 mass= 834.5 kurt= 26.03 hit=1 | 5 mass= 797.7 kurt= 25.37 hit=1 | 11 mass= 794.1 kurt= 27.92 hit=1 | 21 mass= 792.5 kurt= 25.29 hit=1 | 18 mass= 790.6 kurt= 26.48 hit=1 | 1 mass= 753.5 kurt= 28.60 hit=1 | 9 mass= 743.5 kurt= 26.20 hit=1 | 16 mass= 720.4 kurt= 28.25 hit=1 | 26 mass= 532.2 kurt= 36.14 hit=1 mass hit-median=772.0 miss-median=305.5 ; kurt hit-med=27.20 miss-med=42.85
step 42 · model
step 42 · tool output (exit 0)
written
written
step 43 · model
Now let me patch the estimator to use fewer sim seeds for larger models, then run the full audit pipeline on all five audit models.
step 43 · tool output (exit 0)
sim: n_eff=48 sig_frac=0.0031 sim_rec=0.8648 frac9=0.812 REPORT P {"model": "P", "m": 12, "K": 48, "noisy": false, "resid_frac_em": 0.00314, "elbow_gap": 0.85…
sim: n_eff=48 sig_frac=0.0031 sim_rec=0.8648 frac9=0.812
REPORT P {"model": "P", "m": 12, "K": 48, "noisy": false, "resid_frac_em": 0.00314, "elbow_gap": 0.85, "elbow_n": 41, "resid_kurt_max": -0.03, "resid_var_frac": 0.0031, "sim_recovery": 0.8648, "sim_n_eff": 48, "sim_frac9": 0.812, "kurt": 2.43, "seconds": 66.9}
sim: n_eff=48 sig_frac=0.0038 sim_rec=0.8841 frac9=0.833
REPORT R {"model": "R", "m": 12, "K": 48, "noisy": false, "resid_frac_em": 0.00377, "elbow_gap": 0.585, "elbow_n": 47, "resid_kurt_max": -0.3, "resid_var_frac": 0.00376, "sim_recovery": 0.8841, "sim_n_eff": 48, "sim_frac9": 0.833, "kurt": 5.51, "seconds": 71.4}
sim: n_eff=64 sig_frac=0.0047 sim_rec=0.6170 frac9=0.016
REPORT S {"model": "S", "m": 16, "K": 64, "noisy": false, "resid_frac_em": 0.00469, "elbow_gap": 0.748, "elbow_n": 63, "resid_kurt_max": 0.07, "resid_var_frac": 0.00438, "sim_recovery": 0.617, "sim_n_eff": 64, "sim_frac9": 0.016, "kurt": 0.12, "seconds": 86.3}
sim: n_eff=48 sig_frac=0.0016 sim_rec=0.9101 frac9=0.833
REPORT T {"model": "T", "m": 12, "K": 48, "noisy": false, "resid_frac_em": 0.00157, "elbow_gap": 0.538, "elbow_n": 40, "resid_kurt_max": 0.07, "resid_var_frac": 0.00155, "sim_recovery": 0.9101, "sim_n_eff": 48, "sim_frac9": 0.833, "kurt": 1.99, "seconds": 59.5}
sim: n_eff=38 sig_frac=0.0013 sim_rec=0.9679 frac9=0.947
REPORT Q {"model": "Q", "m": 20, "K": 80, "noisy": false, "resid_frac_em": 0.0013, "elbow_gap": 0.162, "elbow_n": 36, "resid_kurt_max": 2.59, "resid_var_frac": 0.00126, "sim_recovery": 0.9679, "sim_n_eff": 38, "sim_frac9": 0.947, "kurt": 20.61, "seconds": 115.8}
step 44 · model
step 44 · tool output (exit 0)
dev/A projkurt max=14.79 med=3.94 | resid_kurt5=3.78 resid_var=0.0012 dev/B projkurt max=3.01 med=1.61 | resid_kurt5=1.70 resid_var=0.0013 dev/C projku…
dev/A projkurt max=14.79 med=3.94 | resid_kurt5=3.78 resid_var=0.0012 dev/B projkurt max=3.01 med=1.61 | resid_kurt5=1.70 resid_var=0.0013 dev/C projkurt max=7.57 med=3.92 | resid_kurt5=5.45 resid_var=0.0009 dev/D projkurt max=1.76 med=0.62 | resid_kurt5=-0.22 resid_var=0.0035 audit/P projkurt max=2.10 med=0.86 | resid_kurt5=-0.56 resid_var=0.0025 audit/Q projkurt max=9.01 med=3.67 | resid_kurt5=3.69 resid_var=0.0013 audit/R projkurt max=4.14 med=1.60 | resid_kurt5=-0.30 resid_var=0.0034 audit/S projkurt max=0.31 med=0.09 | resid_kurt5=-0.37 resid_var=0.0017 audit/T projkurt max=1.65 med=0.82 | resid_kurt5=-0.13 resid_var=0.0014
step 45 · model
step 45 · tool output (exit 0)
S SAE l1=0.10 score=0.9801 l0=23.82 dead=0 S SAE l1=0.30 score=0.8675 l0=16.41 dead=0 S SAE l1=0.60 score=0.6605 l0=9.55 dead=0 S SAE l1=1.00 score=0.3787 l0=5.…
S SAE l1=0.10 score=0.9801 l0=23.82 dead=0 S SAE l1=0.30 score=0.8675 l0=16.41 dead=0 S SAE l1=0.60 score=0.6605 l0=9.55 dead=0 S SAE l1=1.00 score=0.3787 l0=5.00 dead=0 chance recovery m=16 K=64 F=32: 0.529 chance recovery m=16 K=64 F=48: 0.516 chance recovery m=16 K=64 F=64: 0.488
step 46 · model
step 46 · tool output (exit 0)
dev/A stable_atoms=25 big_stable=24 true_F=24 dev/B stable_atoms=35 big_stable=34 true_F=32 dev/C stable_atoms=16 big_stable=15 true_F=24 dev/D stable_atoms=0 b…
dev/A stable_atoms=25 big_stable=24 true_F=24 dev/B stable_atoms=35 big_stable=34 true_F=32 dev/C stable_atoms=16 big_stable=15 true_F=24 dev/D stable_atoms=0 big_stable=0 true_F=22 audit/P stable_atoms=5 big_stable=5 true_F=None audit/Q stable_atoms=35 big_stable=35 true_F=None audit/R stable_atoms=16 big_stable=16 true_F=None audit/S stable_atoms=0 big_stable=0 true_F=None audit/T stable_atoms=18 big_stable=18 true_F=None
step 47 · model
step 47 · tool output (exit 0)
sim: n_eff=48 sig_frac=0.0030 sim_rec=0.8772 frac9=0.833 P R3 | resid=0.0030 sim=0.8772 frac9=0.833 n_eff=48 stable=20 | 129s sim: n_eff=48 sig_frac=0.0015 …
sim: n_eff=48 sig_frac=0.0030 sim_rec=0.8772 frac9=0.833 P R3 | resid=0.0030 sim=0.8772 frac9=0.833 n_eff=48 stable=20 | 129s sim: n_eff=48 sig_frac=0.0015 sim_rec=0.9039 frac9=0.854 T R3 | resid=0.0015 sim=0.9039 frac9=0.854 n_eff=48 stable=34 | 132s
step 48 · model
R3 improves P (stability 5→20, sim 0.865→0.877) and T (18→34). Final choices: P=refine3, T=refine3, Q=EM, R=EM (C-like), S=EM. Let me rebuild and save P and T dictionaries with the R3 candidate.
step 48 · tool output (exit 124)
P (48, 12) float32 unit? 1.1920929e-07
P (48, 12) float32 unit? 1.1920929e-07
step 49 · model
P saved. The call timed out during T — let me rerun T alone.
step 49 · tool output (exit 124)
Agent's final summary.
Generated 2026-11-10 19:24 UTC from /shared/allie/rsi-build-20261110. Papers in the task titles are the source material; every fixture is a fresh synthetic replay.